This journal adheres to a double-blind peer-review process, as part of which the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous throughout the process. Submitted articles will be deemed appropriate by the journal's expert based on the journal's guidelines and then editor-in-chief decides whether they are suitable for peer review. The peer review usually involves review by at least three independent, expert peer reviewers.Reviewers' comments are then sent to the authors so that they can address them. All authors are asked to send their revised manuscripts or respond to the comments. Then the editor-in-chief will decide if the article needs to undergo further peer review (by the same reviewer or another reviewer, who can be a member of the editorial board) or it can be accepted for publication. In case a member of the editorial board or staff submits a manuscript to the journal, it is dealt with in the same manner mentioned and the editor who submitted the manuscript does not have a say in the peer review process or the final decision made. The Journal decision-making process includes the following steps:
The duration of this process depends on the acceptance of review by respected reviewers, submission of reviewer comments and responses to reviewer comments by authors.