مهندسی زیر ساخت های حمل و نقل

مهندسی زیر ساخت های حمل و نقل

بررسی وضعیت پل‌های شریان‌های جاده‌ای استان البرز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 1- استادیار بخش زلزله‌شناسی مهندسی و خطرپذیری مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن و شهرسازی، تهران، ایران
2 2- کارشناس ارشد بخش زلزله شناسی مهندسی و خطرپذیری مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن و شهرسازی، تهران، ایران
3 مربی بخش زلزله‌شناسی مهندسی و خطرپذیری مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن و شهرسازی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
پل‌ها اجزای بسیار مهم شبکه‌های حمل و نقل هستند که به عنوان نقاط کلیدی شبکه، بازیابی آنها پس از از دست دادن عملکرد و یا ایمنی بسیار پیچیده‌تر از سایر دارایی‌ها است. بازسازی پل نیز چالش برانگیز و پرهزینه است. با توجه به نقش بسیار حیاتی ابنیه فنی سیستم حمل و نقل به ویژه پل‌ها، بررسی وضعیت پل‌های شریان‌های جاده‌ای استان البرز ضرورت یافت. در این بررسی ابتدا ابنیه فنی مهم و تاثیرگذار در محور تهران-کرج-قزوین، محور مخصوص کرج – قزوین، محور کندوان، محور طالقان و محور اشتهارد شناسایی شدند. سپس گروه‌های بازرسی فنی به منطقه اعزام شده و عملیات بازرسی عملکردی سازه و شناسایی عوامل آسیب‌پذیری براساس چک لیست‌های از پیش تهیه شده صورت گرفت. پس از برداشت‌های گسترده میدانی، ایرادات موجود در سازه‌ها به همراه کلیه موارد مربوط به وضعیت فعلی فیزیکی و عملکردی آن‌ها تهیه گردید. کلیه پارامترهای برداشت شده در سازه‌ها، مورد وزن‌دهی براساس اهمیت و نوع تأثیرگذاری آسیب قرار گرفت و با توجه به جمیع پارامترهای برداشت شده و همچنین ضریب اهمیت هرکدام، نوعی طبقه‌بندی مدیریتی براساس سطوح آسیب‌پذیری در ابنیه استان در چهار گروه صورت گرفت. بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده در محور اشتهارد: 2 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری A و یک پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری B، در محور طالقان: 2 پل درجه آسیب‌پذیری A و 3 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری B و 1پل با درجه آسیب پذیریC و 2 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری D، در محور کرج- قزوین: 10 پل درجه آسیب‌پذیری A، 12 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری B و 16 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری C و 3 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری D و در محور کندوان: 11 پل درجه آسیب‌پذیری A، 10 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری B و 9 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری C و 2 پل با درجه آسیب‌پذیری D شناسایی گردید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the condition of the bridges of road arteries in Alborz province

نویسندگان English

Ali Beitollahi 1
Morteza Mahdavii 2
Fateme Dehghan Farouji 3
1 - Assistant Professor of Seismology, Engineering and Risk department, Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, Tehran, Iran
2 Senior expert in Seismology, Engineering and Risk Department of road, housing and urban development research, Tehran, Iran
3 بزرگراه شیخ فضل الله نوری خیابان مروی مرکInstructor of Seismology, Engineering and Risk Department of Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Bridges are very important components of transportation networks.Considering the very vital role of the technical infrastructure especially the bridges, it became necessary to examine the condition of the bridges of the road arteries of Alborz province. In this survey, the first, important and influential technical buildings were identified in the Tehran-Karaj-Qazvin axis, the special Karaj-Qazvin axis, the Kandavan axis, the Taleghan axis, and the Eshtehard axis. Then, technical inspection groups were sent to the area and functional inspection of the structure and identification of vulnerability factors were carried out based on pre-prepared checklists. After extensive field observations, defects in the structures were prepared along with all the items related to their current physical and functional condition. All the parameters taken in the structures were weighted based on the importance and type of impact of the damage, and according to all the taken parameters as well as the importance coefficient of each, a kind of management classification was made based on the levels of vulnerability in the buildings of the province into four groups. According to the results obtained in Eshtehard axis: 2 bridges with the degree of vulnerability A and one bridge with the degree of vulnerability B, in the Taleghan axis: 2 bridges with the degree of vulnerability A and 3 bridges with the degree of vulnerability B and 1 bridge with Vulnerability level C and 2 bridges with vulnerability level D, in the Karaj-Qazvin axis: 10 bridges with vulnerability level A, 12 bridges with vulnerability level B, 16 bridges with vulnerability level C and 3 bridges with damage level D vulnerability and in Kandavan axis: 11 bridges with vulnerability level A, 10 bridges with vulnerability level B, 9 bridges with vulnerability level C and 2 bridges with vulnerability level D were identified.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

bridge
road arteries
Alborz province
 Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D. M. and Ishibashi, H. 2019. Toward life-cycle reliability-, risk-and resilience-based design and assessment of bridges and bridge networks under independent and interacting hazards: Emphasis on earthquake, tsunami and corrosion. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 16(1): 26-50. https://doi.org /10.1080/ 15732479.2019.1604770
Argyroudis, S. A. and Mitoulis, S. A. 2021. Vulnerability of bridges to individual and multiple hazards- floods and earthquakes. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 210: 107564. https://doi. org/107564./j.ress.2021.107564
Argyroudis S. A., Mitoulis, S. Α., Winter, M. G. and Kaynia, A. M. 2019. Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 191: 106567.
Argyroudis, S. A., Mitoulis, S. A., Hofer, L., Zanini, M. A., Tubaldi, E. and Frangopol, D. M. 2020. Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment. Sci. Total Environ., 714: 136854.
Banerjee, S., Vishwanath, B. S. and Devendiran, D. K. 2019. Multihazard resilience of highway bridges and bridge networks: A review. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 15(12): 1694-1714.
Berdica, K. 2002. An introduction to road vulnerability: What has been done, is done and should be done. Transp. Policy, 9(2): 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
Chopra, S. S. and Khanna, V. 2015. Interconnectedness and interdependencies of critical infrastructures in the US economy: Implications for resilience. Phys. A, 436: 865-877.
Dalziell, E. and Nicholson, A. 2001. Risk and Impact of Natural Hazards on a Road Network. J. Transp. Eng., 127(2): 159-166.
Deco, A., Bocchini, P. and Frangopol, D. M. 2013. A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10): 1469-1487.
Dezfuli Nezhad, M., Raoufi, R. and Dalvand, A. 2020. “Impact of network density on optimizing budget allocation to bridges for improving the resilience of the transportation network”. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Eng., 6(4): 81-99. doi: 10.22075/JTIE.2020.20001.1446
Dezfuli Nezhad, M., Raoufi, R. and Dalvand, A. 2022. “Bridges security risk assessment considering uncertainty in network topology”. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Eng., 8(3): 111-135. doi: 10.22075/JTIE.2022.2 4530.1554
Dikanski, H., Imam, B. and Hagen-Zanker, A. 2018. Effects of uncertain asset stock data on the assessment of climate change risks: A case study of bridge scour in the UK. Struct. Safe., 71: 1-12.
Dong, Y. and Frangopol, D. M. 2015. Risk and resilience assessment of bridges under mainshock and aftershocks incorporating uncertainties. Eng. Struct., 83: 198-208.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M. and Saydam, D. 2013. Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42: 1451-1467.
Frangopol, D. M. and Bocchini, P. 2012. Bridge network performance, maintenance and optimisation under uncertainty: accomplishments and challenges. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 8(4): 341-356.
Freddi, F., Galasso, C., Cremen, G., et al. 2021. Innovations in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: Recent advances and challenges. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction, 60: 102267.
Guikema, S. and Gardoni, P. 2009. Reliability estimation for networks of reinforced concrete bridges. J. Infrastruct. Syst., 15(2): 61-69.
IPCC. 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Koks, E., Rozenberg, J., Zorn, C., Tariverdi, M., Vousdoukas, M., Fraser, S. A., Hall, J. W. and Hallegatte, S. 2019. A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets. Nat. Commun., 10: 2677.
Leng, J., Zhai, J., Li, Q. and Zhao, L. 2018. Construction of road network vulnerability evaluation index based on general travel cost”. Phys. A, 493: 421-429.
Li, Y., Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M. and Gautam, D. 2020. Long-term resilience and loss assessment of highway bridges under multiple natural hazards. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 16(4): 626-641.
Liu, W. and Song, Z. 2020. Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 193: 106617.
Lu, Q. C. 2018. Modeling network resilience of rail transit under operational incidents. Transp. Res. A, 117(11): 227-237.
Mattsson, L. G. and Jenelius, E. 2015. “Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems- A discussion of recent research”. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy and Practice, 81: 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.0 6.002
Medghalchi, A., Rashvand, P. and Delnavaz, A. 2023. “Identifying bridges with high damage risk using the Taguchi test design method (Case study: Concrete road bridges in Zanjan province)”. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Eng., 9(2): 51-60. doi: 10.22075/JTIE.2023.25022.1567
Mondoro, A., Frangopol, D. M. and Liu, L. 2018. Bridge adaptation and management under climate change uncertainties: A review. Nat. Hazard Rev., 19(1): 04017023.
Nasr, A., Bjornsson, I., Honfi, D., Larsson Ivanov, O., Johansson, J. and Kjelstrom, E. 2019. A review of the potential impacts of climate change on the safety and performance of bridges. Sustain. Resil. Infrastruct., 31: 1-21.
Nasr, A., Kjellstrom, E., Bjornsson, I., Honfi, D., Larsson Ivanov, O. and Johansson, J. 2020. Bridges in a changing climate: A study of the potential impacts of climate change on bridges and their possible adaptations. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 16(4): 738-749.
Postance, B., Hillier, J., Dijkstra, T. and Dixon, N. 2017. Extending natural hazard impacts: An assessment of landslide disruptions on a national road transportation network. Environ. Res. Lett., 12(1): 14010.
Rokneddin, K., Ghosh, J., Dueñas-Osorio, L. and Padgett, J. E. 2013. Bridge retrofit prioritisation for ageing transportation networks subject to seismic hazards. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 9(10): 1050-1066.
Smith, A., Argyroudis, S. A., Winter, M. G. and Mitoulis, S. A. 2021. Economic impact of bridge functionality loss from a resilience perspective: Queensferry Crossing, UK. Proc. Instit. Civ. Eng.: Bridge Eng., 174(4): 254-264.
Talebsafa, P., Rezaifar, O. and Naderpour, H. 2021. “Identification of modal characteristics in order to monitor bridges' health in time domain based on complexity pursuit method”. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(3): 79-94. doi: 10.22075/JTIE.2021.21421.1485
Tang, Y. and Huang, S. 2019. Assessing seismic vulnerability of urban road networks by a Bayesian network approach. Transp. Res. D, 77: 390-402.
Taylor, M. 2017. Vulnerability analysis for transportation networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wardhana, K. and Hadipriono, F. C. 2003. Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States”. J. Perform. Construct. Facil., 17(3): 144-150.
Zhang, X. and Li, H. 2018. Urban resilience and urban sustainability: What we know and what do not know?”. Cities, 72: 141-148.
Zhang, J. H., Hu, F. N., Wang, S. L., Dai, Y. and Wang, Y. X. 2016.Structural vulnerability and intervention of high speed railway networks. Phys. A, 462: 743-751.
Zhang, Q., Yu, H., Li, Z., Zhang, G. and Ma, D. T. 2020. Assessing potential likelihood and impacts of landslides on transportation network vulnerability. Transp. Res. D, 82: 102304.
Zhong, H., Wang, J., Yip, T. L. and Gu, Y. 2018. An innovative gravity-based approach to assess vulnerability of a hazmat road transportation network: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Transp. Res. D, 62: 659-671.

  • تاریخ دریافت 13 آذر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 آذر 1402